Articles

Muslim Brother Hood; Islamic Mafia

There is no question that the most dangerous mafia group in the world is the offspring of the now aging Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood pales the triads, Chinese mafia, Italian Mafia, Russian Mafia, and Korean Mafia into complete insignificance. Even the much feared Mexican drug cartel are now match or comparison to the notorious deadly Muslim brotherhood. Unlike any other mafia organization the Muslim Brotherhood has covertly infiltrated every land on earth in a subversive drive to attain its set goals. The Muslim Brotherhood is full of strategists that work full time on violent and non violent means of infiltrating every society and propagating their agenda of Islamisation and shariah.

Realty is those same Muslims are suffering “democraphobeia”, “freedomophobeia” and “specchphobeia”.  It is a fear of openly honestly and directly raising our mutual concerns with out silencing the other.

Then we have other Muslims, crying foul, alleging we in the west are selecting certain verses in the Koran to attack Islam. Again reality is, the warped Islamic radicals are the ones relying on select suras in the Koran to wage war on the rest, incite hatred and bigotry towards democratic non Muslim countries. The attempts by so called moderate Muslims to take this stance in a bid to detract attention from the true abusers of the Koran, speaks for their denial and ignorance.

The world knows those abusers are all Muslims within the Muslim community.

May be the moderate Muslims should have a look at the internet, postings, blogs, forums, you tube, twitter, face book,  videos and other web sites all containing so called Islamic leaders, imams, sheiks and scholars using the Koran to justify and sow their evil use of the Koran.

It is those same Muslims that have turned the Koran into an unholy text, a terror manual, a perversion on humanity.

Everyone has a right to actively examine and meticulously scrutinize any text, doctrine, ideology or creed that openly threatens the existence of their civilizations and calls for Islamisation of the entire world. In fact any doctrine that proposes such an agenda, should be put on a space shuttle and sent into the oblivion of a black hole for eternity.

So who put Islam in up in flashing neon lights?                                                                                                            Who put the Koran under the microscope?

What caused the world wide scrutiny of Islam?

Who caused Islam to dominate world news?

Which cowardly woman dressing bastard declared war on the west?

It was Osama Bin Laden with the evil terrorist act perpetrated by his radical Islamic friends all in the name of Islam on 9/11.

What part of that equation do the Muslims find hard to comprehend?

Why is Osama Bin Laden still alive?

Because he is a spineless coward that brainwashes other simple minds into sacrificing their lives while he hides like a coward.

So Much for the bravery of Mohammed,  Mohammed must be turning in his grave, this is not what he instructed his followers to do in the Koran.

At the end of the day, we are blessed in the knowledge that God has limitless powers that we can never comprehend. In Gods wisdom and grace this bastardly evil act has turned into good.

It has made the entire world aware of the dangers of Islam, thank you Osama Bin Laden well done sunshine.

“What Middle Eastern Christians have attempted and failed to do in decades if not centuries, Osama Bin Laden has single handedly achieved in a blink of any eye”.

Without mitigating the horrific loss of life on that dark day, the long term result is that Islam is the major casualty of that terrible day, Islam is the one that continues to suffer, and will be forced to fight for its existence in every single country. World wide there are countries enacting laws to deal with and abate Islam and the guise of laws against terror. Some European countries are now enacting laws directly aimed at Islam.  I can not recall in my life time any other country enacting any law to control and regulate any other religion with the exception of Islam. That is why Islam is up in flashing neon lights and under the microscope.

Today most Muslims will never openly voice their support for Osama bin laden, what they think or feel in private is irrelevant as they are only deceiving themselves. They are ashamed to openly condone his acts while some might privately support him. This is the conundrum the Islamic world is now facing, and they shall fall on their own sword. Evil will never triumph over good.

MUSLIM BROTHER HOOD MOTTO
"Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; jihad is our way; and dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope." So reads the motto of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), a transnational Islamist organization with chapters in more than 70 countries.

MUSLIM BROTHER HOOD, HITLER, HAMAS, OSAMA BIN LADEN AND TERRORISM.

The group's long history includes collaboration with Nazi Germany, calls for the destruction of Israel, and support for attacks against American troops.

The Brotherhood's affiliates include the terrorist organization Hamas.

Its alumni include 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abdullah Azzam, Osama bin Laden's terrorist mentor.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, al Qaida's second in command, is said to have been heavily influenced by the ideology of the Brotherhood's Egyptian chapter.

AMERICAS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MUSLIM BROTHER, CAIR AND ISNA

Some of the most prominent Muslim organizations in the United States have close, longstanding relationships with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) was founded by Muslim Brotherhood members in the United States.

And the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) was linked in court papers to a Brotherhood-organized Hamas support effort.

That record has not dissuaded the Obama and George W. Bush administrations from working with MB-affiliated organizations in the United States.

A Hudson Institute report last year identified the AIC as having been planned by the Brotherhood-affiliated Muslim Students Association (MSA).

The AIC was once headed by MSA founder Ahmed Sakr.

Hussain's participation serves to highlight the fact that Washington has no policy for dealing with the Muslim Brotherhood, despite evidence that the group's agenda is hostile to the United States.

Whilst Egypt actively acts to eliminate the Muslim brother Hood, the U.S. government is needlessly legitimizing the Muslim Brotherhood.

The FBI's policy is to not do that.

The agency cut off communications with CAIR in 2008, based upon exhibits in the Hamas-support prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) that places CAIR on a committee created to support Hamas politically and financially.

An FBI congressional liaison wrote last year that "until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner."

Rehab is among a number of conference speakers associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Omar Abdel-Rahman (AKA the "Blind Sheikh"), was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for conspiring to blow up the United Nations and other New York landmarks.

"They're bullet-proof. It's horrible," veteran journalist Douglas Farah said regarding the political strength of Brotherhood-affiliated groups like CAIR and ISNA.

U.S. policy "empower[s] groups whose ultimate goal is the creation of an Islamic nation in the United States."

Farah, a former reporter for the Washington Post, is sharply critical of the Obama Administration's courtship of MB affiliates. Obama's approach closely resembles that of the Bush Administration, which all too often consisted of using Brotherhood organizations like CAIR, ISNA and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) as vehicles for outreach to American Muslims, he said.

Government officials should have a clear policy to avoid doing anything that grants groups like, CAIR, NAIT, ISNA, MAS and the International Institute for Islamic Thought legitimacy, Farah said.

"We don't fund them. We don't have our pictures taken with them. We don't go to their [events]."

The reality, however, is dramatically different, as Democratic and Republican administrations have tried to cultivate the Brotherhood groups as part of a larger anti-terror effort focused on the American Muslim community.

Recent examples have included a State Department-financed trip to Africa by a CAIR executive who spent time trashing U.S. law enforcement; sending representatives of ISNA and the Islamic Circle of North America to represent the United States abroad; and a U.S. Census Bureau lease with a Virginia Islamic Center that law enforcement officials call a front for Hamas.

The MUSLIM BROTHER HOOD: “STRATEGIC SUBERVERSION, DECEPTION AND INFILTRATION”.

The final report issued by Muslimserve - the organization set up to implement President Obama's faith-based initiative in the Muslim Community – included a message from presidential appointee Dalia Mogahed thanking a number of groups including CAIR and ISNA for their work on the project.

The report also showed the logos of CAIR, ISNA, ICNA and the Muslim American Society.

The Obama Administration has invited groups like ISNA to attend iftar dinners [fast-breaking meals during Ramadan] held at the White House and at various federal agency offices.

According to Farah, that's exactly the wrong approach.

Including MB groups at iftars and other events creates the false impression that they have been "vetted" and determined to be clean.

In fact, both CAIR and ISNA were unindicted co-conspirators in the HLF prosecution. Five senior HLF officials were convicted of funneling more than $12 million to Hamas and sentenced to long prison terms.

One document introduced during the trial was an 18-page memorandum written in 1992 by Mohammed Akram, a member of the American branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. It described the role the group sees for itself in America:

"The process of settlement in America is a Civilization-Jihadist process with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

One tactic the Muslim Brotherhood uses in countries where Muslims are a minority is to "subvert" Muslim communities "so they become their de facto spokesmen," said former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs J. Scott Carpenter.

Having senior officials like Brennan and Napolitano meeting publicly with Mattson and others involved in Brotherhood-affiliate groups sent the wrong message to non-Islamist Muslims, according to Carpenter, a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The government is taking a dangerous step and accepting the Brotherhood as representatives of the larger Muslim community.

During his tenure at State, Carpenter said there were "unofficial guidances governing how State Department employees deal with Muslim Brotherhood supporters. The "general idea was that the Muslim Brotherhood should not benefit from U.S. taxpayer dollars."

The policy (Carpenter left the State Department in 2007 but believes the Obama Administration has continued) was unevenly enforced from country to country, depending on the ambassador and the position of the Muslim Brotherhood in a particular area. There was a lot of pushback from diplomats who argued that the United States needs to be able to talk with virtually anyone – including hostile groups like the MB.

According to Carpenter, U.S. diplomatic efforts to distance itself from the Muslim Brotherhood were undercut by democracy-promotion efforts in Iraq, where Washington and Coalition forces found it necessary to work with Islamist parties that may have been involved with the Brotherhood. In Egypt, diplomats were barred from working with the MB as an organization but could deal with Brotherhood members of Parliament.

Not with standing that the Muslim brother Hood are an outlawed group, Washington sought to walk a fine line – opposing the Mubarak government's repressive policies without being seen as endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood. "You don't want these groups [the Brotherhood and sympathizers] undermining the state" he said, and do not want the United States to be seen as endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood over other political parties. Why would America hinder and not assist Mubarak in his efforts to rid Egypt of this menace?

Carpenter dismissed the official explanation that the invitation to Muslim Brotherhood MPs to attend President Obama's June 2009 Cairo speech was purely the result of an Egyptian decision about who to invite. American presidents decide who they will meet on these trips and do not cede that choice to foreign governments, Carpenter said.

He believes the Obama Administration seems to believe that "political Islam is on the march." That world view "can become a self-fulfilling policy," he added.

Author Lorenzo Vidino, a careful observer of Brotherhood activities in the United States, explains the government's inability to come up with a workable strategy to deal with MB affiliate groups inside the United States.

In his book, The New Muslim Brotherhood in the West, Vidino cites FBI Director Robert Mueller's statement that the Bureau does not have a responsibility to consider the ideological background of some of the organizations it engages with and the consequences of partnering with them.

"In an organization whose weltanschauung is based on obtaining convictions and staying away from thorny ideological issues, investigating Brotherhood networks is hardly a recipe for fast career advancement.

In the words of a former FBI agent, 'investigating jihadists gets you a promotion, investigating brothers gets you a headache,'" Vidino writes.

What officials fail to understand is that the Brotherhood people "are only doing outreach in order to subvert you," Coughlin said.

Rather than engage it, Coughlin believes the U.S. government should designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.

While al Qaida seeks to destroy the United States through terrorism, the Brotherhood seeks to achieve this through "ideological subversion," he said. The MB and al-Qaida "are two sides of the same coin."